摘 要
言词原则成为现代法制社会刑事诉讼中通行的原则,主要是因其在保障法庭审理的对抗性的同时,既能体现诉讼程序的合理性又能保障案件事实真相之发现。我国修改后的刑诉法确立了具有明显对抗色彩的“抗辩式”庭审方式,但立法上却没有确保这1庭审方式有效运作的.言词原则,甚至立法和有关司法解释中有些内容还严重背离了言词原则的要求,不能满足司法实践中保障被告人质证权和发现案件事实真相的双重需要。因此,确立言词原则并对有关刑事诉讼法条文进行修改和补充,将对我国刑事诉讼的民主进程发挥积极的推动作用。
关键词：言词原则；保障；完善
ABSTRACT
The principle of verbalism that becomes worldwide practices principles of contemporary legal society is main based on that it can guarantee participants contesting on court trial, mean while, it also embody the procedure reasonableness as well as guarantee the case’s facts to be disclosed. The reviewed criminal procedure law of our country build an accusing-defending trial model that aiming at end chancing the participants contesting on court. But the law did not build the principle of verbalism that could guarantee the accusing-defending trial model to be operation efficiently, besides, some articles of legislation and judicial interpretation are deviate from the principle of verbalism is to say, the legisilation is no longer fully catch up with the double needness to guarantee the case’s facts. Therefore, to establish the principle verbalism and to mend or comlete the articles of our criminal procedure law can surely propel the democratic course of our criminal procedure actively.
Key words: the principle of verbalism; suggestion; perfection
..............................
注：【包括：毕业论文，任务书，开题报告】
